Sunday, February 1, 2015
Viewing MacKinnon through Young's Five Faces of Oppression
In Five
Faces of Oppression, Iris Young redefines oppression as “the disadvantage
and injustice some people suffer, not because some tyrannical group intends to
keep them down, but because of the everyday practices of a well-intentioned
liberal society” (Young 92). Young breaks oppression down into five key conditions:
exploitation, marginalization, powerlessness, cultural imperialism, and
violence. Through these acts, women as a social group are reduced to a lesser
status because they are the other to the standard, gender neutral/normal that is maleness. MacKinnon's discussion of dominance through differences is based mostly on Young's conditions except for cultural imperialism. The fundamental theory of exploitation that Young sets out is based on
Marx’s labor theory of value, in which the have-nots expend effort in order to
maintain the power of the haves, yet they are still dependent. It is expected
that a wife supports her husband by making sure dinner is cooked, his dry
cleaning is picked up, and the children are taken care of. It is expected that,
despite what a woman’s desires are, she will fulfill her man’s needs first. Instead
of an equal trade, women are expected of with little in return. In this way,
women are also marginalized. If a woman’s traits do not contribute to her
ability to be a mother or wife, then those traits are seen as unfavorable, not
only because men have no value for them, but also because they often give women
an edge over men. Young
describes this difference between professionals and non-professionals as a
difference in status as opposed to a difference in class, and I think here MacKinnon would argue that it is a difference based on differences because even in gender neutral situations, women are still compared to men as the norm. This is because gender is a comparison of unlikeness, while equality demands that you treat unlikness the same. This can be exemplified in the workplace where women make significantly less than men, while having to work to overcome the stereotypical norms that are expected of "corporate" employees. While women may
consider themselves equal because they hold corporate positions, they themselves still hold a different status because those positions aren't ubiquitously available. This lack of respect and power, as well as the stereotypes associated
with women being irrational, emotional, and weak, all lead to a blatant inequality based on physiological differences that don't always necessarily result in a different expression.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment