As Mackinnon unravels the issues
with both the sameness and difference standards, which inhabit modern sex
equality practices, cultural imperialism—the most common aspect of oppression
according to Young—becomes apparent in the language of legal sexual inequality,
which “provide[s] two ways for the law to hold women to a male standard.” Marginalization
becomes evident within these same legal practices when “maleness provides[s] original
entitlement, not questioned on the basis of its gender,” but male entities
still benefit from gender-blind rulings such as alimony and child custody because
fresh inequality is derived under the guise of progress. Mackinnon acknowledges that mere political silence is not the only problem of equality, but in their silenced state and at the height of their marginalization women "are deprived of a life out of which articulation might come."
The incorporation of Young’s ideas
of exploitation and powerlessness are more concrete in Mackinnon’s argument
against the difference approach than other aspects of oppression because her
main argument relies on practices within the workplace instead of political
theory. The workplace inequality Mackinnon describes in differentiated between original,
imposed, and imaginary. Original inequality assumes “excluding women is always
an option if inequality feels in tension with the pursuit [of] itself” and
denies women rights because men don’t need these rights. Imposed inequality
assumes there is no male precedent to exemplify what basic human rights should
be in this situation. Imaginary inequality is solely based on perceptual
differences between genders. All rely on the inherent differences between men and
women and “for women to affirm differences, when differences mean dominance…means
to affirm the qualities and characteristics of powerlessness.”
If male
dominance was not already clearly defined in women’s role depicted in relation
to men within the workplace and society at large, the quote above clearly relates
how difference standards are inherently unequal. “The difference approach tries
to map reality; the dominance approach tries to challenge and change it.” The
dominance approach also highlights the violence—the last and perhaps most
radical form of oppression—which the difference approach seems to ignore and which
women are subjected to because they are women and because all the other forms
of persecution lead women to the reality of such an existence. The statistics regarding
assault on a female is significantly higher than assaults committed on males
and workplace inequality drives (some) women into professions which both
objectify and exploit violence committed against them in the form of sex.
“Protection
is not a dirty word and equality not a special privilege,” but difference
implies inequality and dominance acknowledges the reality of this approach with
its issues.
-Sarah
I really liked how you exemplified the points you draw from the article with quotes. It helps your conclusions to come across more concrete. You also very clearly stated what is the difference approach and what is the dominance approach and what they stand for. I also really like how you ended your response. The quote at the end “Protection is not a dirty word and equality not a special privilege,” is very powerful and fits very well with what you articulate on through your response.
ReplyDelete