Hande Lara Sever
For this response I’ll be
concentrating on chapter 14 as Athanasiou and Butler give very good examples
representing how capitalist democracy lacks plurality. Athanasiou says “New
political collectives, such as the Indignados of Spain, the Outraged of Greece
and Occupy Wall Street in the United States seek to reclaim democracy from
capitalism and corporate power.” The protests organized by these collectives
faced severe police brutality and crack down, and as a result the homogeneous
accumulation of wealth among the very few continues and neoliberal politics
continue to disadvantage masses and leave them voiceless. Mouffe states that
for an inclusive democracy the legitimation of conflict and division is
necessary for the assertion of equal liberty for all.Thus according to Mouffe’s
argument these happen because an inclusive democracy is not integrated and
rather governments function with corporate interest. “When the Outraged in
Athens planned a symbolic encirclement of the Parliament House to stop a five
year austerity plan, the police pre-emptively enclosed the parliament in an
ironclad fortification in order to thwart the protesters.” This is a very
interesting example as it literally shows how the parliament that is supposed
to represent people’s will is eliticized and is unable to represent public
interest and this failure is protected with police power in order to continue being
a functional state according to Rawls. The austerity measures that are imposed
on Greece is considered as the universal rational consensus by the European
Union and Greek people who revolted against these measures are often
represented as “irrational” and “unreasonable”. As a result both the European
Parliament and the Greek Parliament fails to overcome the problem because of
the elimination of legitimate dissent. As Iris Young stated in Polity and Group
Difference “In a society where some groups are privileged while others are
oppressed insisting that as citizens persons should leave behind their
particular affiliations and experiences to adopt a general point of view serves
only to reinforce that privilege; for the perspectives and interests of the
privileged will tend to dominate this unified public, marginalizing or
silencing those of other groups.” As a result what we see in Europe today is
the reinforcement of privilege through austerity measures.
I think that you have a very powerful voice.
ReplyDeletePrivilege is a world-wide phenomenon but I do agree that, as you stated "the reinforcement of privilege through austerity measures" is rather outrageous in Europe. My grandmother grew up in Alsace, one of the smallest regions of France (adjacent to Germany and Switzerland). She was raised in a Jewish household. In 1940, Alsace was occupied by Germany and my grandparents went to school under the instruction of German professors (where in which they were forbidden to speak French and to practice their religion). A few years ago, my grandmother explained to me that France would become exceedingly anti-Semitic (not that it already wasn't) -- that there would be extreme acts of violence against the Jewish community. However, not only have there been extreme acts (burning of temples, of any sacred grounds) of brutality against the Jewish community but also the Muslim community. We briefly discussed in class the role of the hijab in France. It is appalling to recognize that there is a LAW that forbids women from "face covering". This is an example of an EXPLICIT act of brutality against another, a Muslim woman.
Malaika if you haven't watched it already you might be interested in this movie. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0490234/
ReplyDeleteAt the beginning of the movie it covers how France helped Germany to get French Jewish citizens to be send to concentration camps.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete